These are old archived entries from my journal, Ornamental Illness. I have eliminated all graphics (except those in context of an entry) to save on my bandwidth usage.

Please visit my other sites below. I promise they're more visually interesting.

Ornamental Illness main entry page

Ann-S-Thesia Web Graphics

Ann's Gemstone Jewelry

The Dingbatcave

Art Objects

Eyebalm Fine Art

Windowsill Cactus

Saturday, July 5, 2003


This was a silly little post over at one of the Pink Floyd boards the other day. It was "which Floyd are you most compatible with?" The site is like one of those 'how compatible are you with whomever' based on biorhythms: BioLoveMatch. Yeah, I know, it's silly. Anyway, these are my results:

Physical: 96
Emotional: 33
Intellectual: 84
Total: 71

Physical: 85
Emotional: 97
Intellectual: 49
Total: 78

Physical: 57
Emotional: 62
Intellectual: 88
Total: 70

Physical: 68
Emotional: 84
Intellectual: 14
Total: 56

Physical: 33
Emotional: 94
Intellectual: 58
Total: 62

Actually, not too surprising. So, if I'm most emotionally compatible with Syd, does that mean I also suffer emotional problems too? Nice physical compatibility with Roger, heh. And what's with the high intellectual compatibility with Nick (of all people)...does that mean I have a good understanding of collecting antique racing cars?

So I tried it again, this time using noneother than Stan as my "lovematch" and came up with this:

Physical: 99
Emotional: 53
Intellectual: 23
Total: 59

Whoah...everyone except David Gilmour in Pink Floyd scored higher than Stan! I mean, nice physical compatibility there, but intellectual only 23? Stan, what's up with THAT?

So I tried it on another of my favorite musicians, Brian Eno:

Brian Eno:
Physical: 20
Emotional: 78
Intellectual: 65
Total: 55

I'm a bit bummed about that low score.

OK, just out of the blue I decided to try David Bowie for no apparent reason:

David Bowie:
Physical: 96
Emotional: 90
Intellectual: 72
Total: 86

And he's the highest of them all! (overall) Weird.

It's just silly. Not to be taken too seriously. I think Astrology if more accurate.

Posted by Ann on 07/05/03@08:36 AM CST ..::Link::..

Wednesday, July 2, 2003

Why am I more offended by...

Spam from "Scot and Maurine Proctor" of Meridian Magazine (some LDS church or something) than I am porn spam? I mean, the porn spam is just stupid, and yeah, I get tired of seeing twats in my face when I check my email, but for some reason this Mormon Spam is even more offensive to me. I almost clicked an unsubscribe button, but figured I'd probably be on Orrin Hatch's hitlist or something.

Posted by Ann on 07/02/03@10:17 AM CST ..::Link::..
By Ann @ 20:55 AM CST:07:20:03 ..::Link::..